Site icon (the) Developer Advocate

DevRel Is Becoming Developer GTM. No — It Always Was.

There’s a take making the rounds right now: “DevRel is shifting into developer GTM.”

No, it’s not. It always was.

Your CFO didn’t approve that headcount for funsies. Good DevRel has always been marketing and selling through education and inspiration. That’s the whole job. That’s why companies fund it.

What’s actually changing is the timeline leadership is willing to wait on.

The work didn’t change. The patience did.

Stressed companies — the ones worried about revenue, runway, or missing a market window — want this-quarter impact. They want a DevRel hire to move a number you can point to before the next board deck.

Healthier companies have the patience to wait for larger impact next year, or the year after. Pipeline takes time. Trust takes time. A developer audience is a compounding asset, not a campaign.

That’s the whole shift. Leadership is just saying the quiet part out loud.

When the macro tightens, the runway shortens, and the question “how does this ladder to revenue?” goes from a polite annual review topic to a Monday morning email. The activities don’t have to change. The narrative around them does.

Every DevRel activity ladders to the business

If you can’t trace your work to one of these, somebody’s doing it wrong. Probably the person who hired you. Possibly you.

Content (blog posts, talks, videos, podcasts)

Code (libraries, samples, SDKs, integrations, “skills”)

Community (Slack, Discord, forums, events, user groups)

Docs

That’s the entire scoreboard: faster ramping, expansion revenue, higher retention, lower CAC. Pick one. Probably more than one. If a DevRel activity can’t be traced to any of them, you should be able to explain why anyway — and “developer love” is not the answer your CFO is grading.

“But what about community management? Or technical evangelism?”

The common pushback: community management is really field marketing, advocacy and education are really technical marketing, and the new “build for agents” work is a different beast entirely. Every company is different. Every role mutates with the company stage and the industry.

All true. But the test isn’t what bucket does the role belong in. The test is does it ladder to a business goal a CFO would fund?

Take community travel. The lazy version is “show up, give the talk, post the photos, fly home.” The version that actually pays for itself is lining up two to five customer meetings with the AEs in that city while you’re already there. Influence a buying decision. Unblock an expansion deal. Inspire a champion to escalate internally.

That’s not field marketing. That’s not “community.” That’s level-2 sales engineering — the company brings in the big guns to influence a deal, and the DevRel person is the big guns. The next level up is product/eng execs, the C-suite, or founders.

If you’re doing community travel and not lining up customer meetings, you’re leaving money on the table. If you’re doing customer meetings and not telling your CFO, you’re leaving budget on the table.

The three activities of any company

In our world (B2B-ish software, mostly), every company does exactly three things:

  1. Build the product
  2. Take that product to market
  3. Run the company internally (ops, finance, HR)

Some DevRel work touches product — feedback loops, design partnerships, pre-release shaping. Real, valuable, and rarely the primary reason a company hires a DevRel team.

Almost everything else is GTM. And honestly, you can argue everything is GTM, because the only reason a company builds a product is to take it to a market. Leadership has a fiduciary duty to maximize returns to shareholders. If your work doesn’t show up somewhere on the path between “build” and “money in the bank,” it’s a hobby the company is paying for.

That isn’t cynical. It’s the deal.

What this means if you’re a DevRel IC

What this means if you lead a DevRel team

So what am I missing?

Genuinely — what am I missing?

I keep hearing “DevRel is shifting.” I keep looking at the work and seeing the same four things ladder to the same four metrics they always did. The pressure changed. The label changed. The job didn’t.

If you think the job actually changed, I want to hear why. Hit me up.

Thanks to Adi Polak for the chat and inspiration to write this post.

Exit mobile version